Herbalife Ltd.Full report →1 / 15
HLFNYSEThe short version

Herbalife Ltd.

Herbalife sells nutrition products through 6.4 million independent members in 95 markets. Revenue grew in 2025 for the first time since 2021, and about $2.0 billion of debt sits ahead of a $1.3 billion equity.

The shares closed at $61.47 in February 2019 and $5.11 in February 2025; at $12.18 they are 2.4 times that low and 80% below the peak.
Mkt cap $2.1BNet debt $1.5BEV $3.6BP/E FY27E 3.9×ND/EBITDA FY27E 2.1×
$12.18
Share price, 27 July 2026
$5,037.5M
FY2025 net sales, up 0.9%
6.4M
Members across 95 markets
20.9%
India share of 1Q26 net sales
SwipeScroll
Snapshot

Herbalife Ltd. in numbers

Price
$12.18as of 2026-07-27
Mkt cap
$2.1B
Net debt
$1.5B
EV
$3.6B
12m perf
+24.9%
3m ADV
$20.3M
Year to Dec (USD)2023202420252026E2027E2028E
Sales5.1B5.0B5.0B5.2B5.4B5.6B
EBITDA674.1M724.7M800.8M
EBIT356.4M385.9M481.0M532.7M574.3M666.5M
EBIT margin7.0%7.7%9.5%10.2%10.7%11.9%
EPS1.422.502.202.563.153.69
EV/EBITDA5.4×5.0×4.5×
EV/EBIT10.2×9.4×7.6×6.8×6.3×5.5×
P/E8.6×4.9×5.5×4.8×3.9×3.3×
FCF yield10.6%7.8%12.1%
Gearingn/an/an/a
Consensus: S&P Capital IQ (CapIQ) · as of 2026-07-28Derived from run data; ratios use the latest price.
The statements

Revenue near its 2019 level, margins below their peak, cash flow steady.

FY2020 → FY2025as reported · $
Revenue$5.0B+1%
Gross margin77.9%flat
Operating margin9.5%+1.8pp
Net income$228M−10%
EPS$2.20−12%
Free cash flow$253M+55%
Open the full statements →
As reported in the consolidated statements, FY2020 through FY2025.
  • Top line. Net sales peaked at $5,802.8 million in 2021 and were $5,037.5 million in 2025 — a 0.9% rise, the first since 2021, on a 3.2% price effect against a 0.5% fall in volume.
  • Margins. Operating margin fell from 12.7% in 2021 to 7.0% in 2023 and recovered to 9.5% in 2025, mostly on a restructuring programme that took about $80 million of annual cost out.
  • Cash. Free cash flow was $252.9 million in 2025 against net income of $228.3 million; earnings per share were $2.20, against $4.13 in 2021.
Sales leader retention

The retention rate improved against a bar the company sets and last measured in 2021.

70.3%
Reported retention, January 2026 cycle+2.4 pts since January 2021
8.2 pts
Last disclosed gap, reported against adjusted68.9% against 60.7%, for 2022
580,617
Sales leaders outside China, February 2025582,107 two cycles earlier
Retention rates as disclosed in the FY2025 Form 10-K; the adjusted basis was last published in the FY2021 filing.
  • The finding. Reported sales-leader retention has risen 2.4 points since the January 2021 cycle, to 70.3%, while the last time Herbalife quantified the effect of its lowered re-qualification thresholds the gap was 8.2 points — 68.9% reported against 60.7% adjusted — and every filing since FY2021 has said the lower-threshold method was extended to more markets without restating the adjustment.
  • The size of it. The 8.2-point adjustment is 3.4 times the 2.4-point reported gain. On the adjusted basis the January 2022 cycle fell 2.2 points while the reported basis rose 1.0 point — one cycle, moving both ways.
  • Against that. The ex-China leader count rose 1.6% in the last completed cycle, North American retention reached 77.8%, and Nu Skin lost 19% of its sales leaders over the same year. The February 2026 count settles it.
Which EBITDA counts

One balance sheet, three EBITDAs, half a turn of leverage between them.

Leverage by earnings measure
Earnings measureTTM Mar 2026Net leverage
Credit Agreement EBITDA$744.0M2.41x
Adjusted EBITDA$668.4M2.68x
EBITDA, unadjusted$617.7M2.90x
Struck on $2,044.6 million of Credit Agreement total debt at 31 March 2026, with cash netting capped at $250.0 million as the documents define it.
  • Every leverage ratio in Herbalife's covenant stack is struck on Credit Agreement EBITDA of $744.0 million for the twelve months to March 2026 — $75.6 million above the company's own adjusted EBITDA of $668.4 million, which itself excludes $36.6 million of FY2025 technology cost while the capitalised remainder of the same $357 million programme amortises inside a depreciation line EBITDA removes by construction —
  • and the 2.49 times ratio that measure produces is what cleared the 3.00:1.00 gate the ninth amendment installed for the restored $400.0 million restricted-payments basket, on a base whose FY2026 India GST mismatch is now guided to cost $20-25 million.
  • Wide headroom. Herbalife reconciles Credit Agreement EBITDA in full each quarter and every technology add-back sits on its own labelled line. The binding 4.00:1.00 test needs that measure to fall 29%, to about $525.5 million, against $670.1 million even at the 2023 trough. The spread is a measurement fact, not a solvency one.
The last four years

Debt came down $796 million; the equity lost $3.1 billion over the same span.

Enterprise value: market value plus net debt
Enterprise value fell from $6,677 million to $2,856 million; the multiple went from 7.6 times to 4.3 times.
  • The record. Between 2021 and 2025 Herbalife generated $1,143.8 million of free cash flow and cut Credit Agreement total debt from $2,845.8 million to $2,050.0 million, and over the same four years its equity fell from $4,433 million to $1,335 million, because adjusted EBITDA dropped 24.7% and the enterprise multiple went from 7.6 times to 4.6 times.
  • The forward version is smaller. The stated target takes net debt from $1,593.4 million to $1.0 billion — $593 million, or $5.72 a share flat, and $17.90 a share at an unchanged multiple. The transfer that already ran retired $795.8 million.
  • What is different now. Adjusted EBITDA has risen two years running, $570.6M to $634.8M to $657.6M, guided $675–705M. Against that, capital expenditure fell from $151.4M to $80.4M and cannot make that contribution again.
Where a dollar goes

Member compensation takes a third of every sales dollar, and it is close to fixed.

A dollar of FY2025 net sales
FY2025 net sales of $5,037.5 million, as reported.
  • The channel is the cost. Herbalife reports a 77.9% gross margin, but distribution sits below that line: selling expenses, almost entirely member commissions, took 35.4% of sales in 2025 and have held between 35% and 38% for five years.
  • Overhead did the work. Administrative cost rose from 28.6% of sales in 2021 to 34.6% in 2024, then fell to 33.0% in 2025 as the restructuring completed — about $80 million of annual saving for $76.1 million of cumulative cost.
  • The network. Of roughly 6.4 million members, about 580,600 outside China held sales-leader status after the February 2025 re-qualification; the rest are, in the company's words, discount buyers or small retailers.
India

One market carries the top line, and its step-change has a date on it.

India quarterly net sales
The GST rate cut took effect 22 September 2025; the growth-rate benefit annualises in September 2026.
  • The concentration. India was 8.9% of net sales in 2021 and 20.9% in the March 2026 quarter, rising from $519.1 million to $889.6 million while the rest of the company fell 21.5%.
  • A government-funded price cut. India's tax on most Herbalife products fell from 18% to 5%, cutting shelf prices about 11% without touching what Herbalife realises. India volume rose 36.9% in the March quarter.
  • The cost side. The input-credit mismatch is guided at $20–25 million for 2026, up from about $16 million three months earlier, and it grows with India. Outside India, local-currency sales were about 1.5% lower in the quarter.
Weight management

The diet-branded shelf shrank while protein at retail grew.

Net sales change over the two years to fiscal 2025
Fiscal years differ: BellRing ends September, Simply Good Foods August, the others December.
  • The controlled test. Quest, positioned on protein, grew 26.5% while Atkins, positioned on dieting, fell 20.1% — same shelves, same buyers, same drugs in the market. GLP-1 appears in none of five years of Herbalife's Form 10-K filings.
  • Herbalife's own line. Weight management is the only major line smaller than in 2019, down 8.8%, and it is 54.5% of sales; energy, sports and fitness rose 75.3% over the same seven years.
  • Against that. Medifast, the closest structural peer, lost 64% over the two years in which Herbalife's weight-management line fell 3.7%. Something in the network held a base Medifast's did not.
Debt and interest

Interest took 45 cents of every operating dollar in 2025; April's refinancing cut the coupon.

Operating income and interest expense
The April 2026 refinancing cut the secured coupon from 12.250% to 7.750%, worth about $45 million a year.
  • The trade. Herbalife swapped $1,165 million of expensive secured debt for $1,225 million of cheaper secured debt. Gross debt rose about $60 million, cash interest falls roughly $45 million a year, and the cash cost was about $72 million.
  • What it did not do. It did not deleverage, and a preliminary $95 million loss on extinguishment lands in the second quarter of 2026 — the second such write-off in three years.
  • The claim on cash. Reaching $1.4 billion of gross debt by 2028 means retiring about $280 million a year against a run-rate near $290 million, so on the current plan the equity is paid by debt falling rather than by cash coming out.
Free cash flow

The cash-flow improvement came from the capital line, and that source runs out in 2026.

Operating cash flow, capital expenditure and free cash flow
Free cash flow of $252.9 million is a 20.0% yield on $1,262.7 million of market value.
  • The decomposition. Between 2023 and 2025 free cash flow rose $30.4 million while operating cash flow fell $24.2 million. All of the improvement, and more, came from spending $54.6 million less on capital.
  • The programme behind it. Herbalife has spent about $357 million of a planned $400 million rebuilding its member technology, and none of it has reduced adjusted EBITDA — $36.6 million sat in the 2025 add-backs alone.
  • 2026 guidance. Capital expenditure of $50–80 million plus $35–55 million of capitalised cloud-software cost brackets the $105.4 million of combined spend in 2025, with a midpoint slightly above it.
Capital allocation

The last $2.0 billion of buybacks bought shares now worth $518 million.

$2,006.6M
Spent on buybacks, 2020–2022
42.5M
Shares retired, at an average $47.21
$517.7M
Worth at $12.1825.8% of the cost recovered
$400M
Restricted-payments basket, restored April 2026
Cumulative repurchases since 2007 are about $6.5 billion; the company names them as the source of its debt.
  • Where it went. About $1,318 million of the $2,007 million, or 66%, retired the position of a single activist holder rather than shrinking the share count against the open market.
  • What management is paid on. The annual bonus and the reinstated performance stock units both run on local-currency net sales and adjusted EBITDA. Neither cash flow, nor leverage, nor debt reduction appears in either plan.
  • The stated priority. No open-market repurchases in 2023, 2024, 2025 or the first quarter of 2026, and roughly $400 million of documented capacity sits unused against a $1.26 billion market value.
Valuation

At $12.18 the equity is 44% of the enterprise, so the multiple does most of the work.

Value per share at $670 million of adjusted EBITDA
Net debt held at $1,593.4 million; reaching the 2028 target of $1.0 billion adds a flat $5.72 to every row.
  • The arithmetic. One turn of the multiple is $6.46 a share, 53% of the price, while a $50 million move in adjusted EBITDA at today's multiple is $2.06. Free cash flow of $252.9 million is a 20.0% yield on market value.
  • The identifiable return. If enterprise value holds and net debt falls to $1.0 billion, the residual is $17.90 a share — 47% above today, with no change in the multiple and no growth. Consensus sits at $18.33, from two to three analysts.
  • Against it. The identical transfer ran from 2021 to 2025 and the equity still lost 70%, because EBITDA and the multiple moved further than the debt did.
Grid values are per share at the stated multiple on $670 million of adjusted EBITDA, drawn from the report's sensitivity table.
What to watch

A 20% free-cash-flow yield on a leveraged claim, with the growth concentrated in one market.

This distils a guided study built chapter by chapter from the filings, calls and presentations themselves.

Compiled from the full report · 2026-07-28 · For information, not investment advice.